English Essay for Hurling Insults and Vehemently Criticizing

Question: Discuss about theEnglish Essay for Hurling Insults and Vehemently Criticizing. Answer: In the article, People blame Facebook for fake news and partisan bile. Theyre wrong, the authors argue that although social media channels have been accused of provoking political turmoil in America, causing political instability, by hurling insults and vehemently criticizing the political leaders is power, the charge is barely true. Forestal and Philips argue that social media might have emerged to be a platform that enables its users engage in conversations more openly on a public domain, but it does nothing more than unravel what has been existing in the society since long before (Forestal et al.). The authors point out that the very DNA of sites like Twitter makes them antithetical to sophisticated, thoughtful political conversation.. With the emergence of social media sites, one notices how supporters of a political party are being subject to racial and sexual abuse on social media sites like Twitter, or how supporters of a political party sling mud at supporters of a rival part y openly, and uttering the most uncensored, abominable words humanity has ever heard of. However, social media sites do not incite this hatred nor does it cause such venomous speech, as these technologies might instead beuncoveringthe fissures that already exist within the American public.. Rather it brings on the surface what had always existed, but had not been unraveled in absence of a public medium. Instead of blaming social media sites for having corrupted the democracy, it is exigent that the American citizens open their eyes to the problem, and try to shape their ethical attitude towards a political problem. Although the above argument presented by the authors is partially true, it is undeniable that social media does turn people into thoughtless political extremists. Hence, the points stated by the author are highly objectionable, and the topic sentence of the essay is that social media does play an active role in creating political turmoil. . It is indeed true as pointed out by Forestal and Philips, that communal hatred, racial abuse and utter disrespect towards the opposing party has always been there. However, as critics like Enli have argued, the social media sites help in aggravating the situation, by provoking others to join some atrocious pages, which intend to make atrocious memes of the political leaders and their supporters (Enli et al.). While earlier one would keep his abusive words and slangs confined to himself and his friends, social media sites like Twitter or Facebook helps his inflammatory ideas rise to the top of the conversation, become viral in a while, and with re- tweets and likes and shares, larger number of people are getting influenced by such ideas. While memes have emerged to be the lowest and cheapest forms of socio-political discourse, Bennett has argued that the social media channels help one to hide behind the cover, and promote a shouting-down of the opposition, without trying to adopt an analytical way of evaluating the political situation (Bennett). While the authors state that racial and sexual abuse and utter indignation towards the political leaders of the opposing party have always been a problem , it should be noted that people participating in even the most abominable political discourses also had little interest and knowledge about political affairs. On the other hand, social media users, regardless of their knowledge in political matters, get attracted to the meaningless ramblings of the uninformed people and their degrading posts, and make the sense of enmity viral in a short while. Even if this does not help in creating a problem that had been existing since a long time back, helps in aggravating the situation, by creating a sense of enmity, confusion and hatred amongst all, influencing the majority of people (Zhu et al.). To sum it up, it should be noted that even though social media is not the only medium that promotes political turmoil and social instability, it does play a crucial role in falsifying information, misquoting political speeches, misrepresenting political agendas and encouraging political instability and conflicts. Hence, unchecked use of social media can prove to be detrimental in future. Reference List: Bennett, W. Lance. "Changing societies, changing media systems: Challenges for communication theory, research and education."Can the Media Serve Democracy?. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. 151-163. Enli, Gunn, and Hallvard Moe. "Introduction to Special Issue: Social media and election campaignskey tendencies and ways forward."Information, Communication Society16.5 (2013): 637-645. Forestal, Jennifer et al. "Analysis | People Blame Facebook For Fake News And Partisan Bile. TheyRe Wrong.".Washington Post. N.p., 2017. Web. 8 May 2017. Zhu, Qinfeng, Marko Skoric, and Fei Shen. "I Shield Myself From Thee: Selective Avoidance on Social Media During Political Protests."Political Communication34.1 (2017): 112-131.